Abraham Lincoln’s Faith

Biblical World UniversityFor PDF Version: Abraham Lincoln’s Faith


 

In response to being presented a Bible on September 7, 1864, Abraham Lincoln said:

In regard to this Great Book, I have but to say, it is the best gift God has given to man. All the good Saviour gave to the world was communicated through this book. But for it we could not know right from wrong. All things most desirable for man’s welfare, here and hereafter, are to be found portrayed in it.[1]

This is the view many would have of Lincoln’s faith, but some people have presented Lincoln in a different light, including some who knew him well. William Herndon, Lincoln’s law partner for about 18 years, said of him: “As to Mr. Lincoln’s religious views, he was, in short, an infidel. . . . Mr. Lincoln told me a thousand times that he did not believe the Bible was the revelation of God as the Christian world contends.”[2]

Skeptics of Lincoln’s Christian faith have portrayed him as not just an unbeliever but as a scoffer. Charles Minor records of Lincoln that “when he went to church, he went to mock and came away to mimic.”[3] Yet, Rev. James Smith, the pastor of the First Presbyterian Church in Springfield where Lincoln attended for over 10 years, gives a much different picture. Replying to a number of questions posed in a letter from Herndon, Smith wrote: “With regard to your second question, I beg leave to say it is a very easy matter to prove that while I was pastor of the First Presbyterian Church in Springfield, Mr. Lincoln did avow his belief in the divine authority and inspiration of the Scriptures.”[4]

Which of these views is right? Why the contrary views? Views of Lincoln’s faith can differ depending upon the source of information and the time period considered. Lincoln had many friends and enemies, some of whom were certainly not objective when evaluating his life. Lincoln also underwent a change in his beliefs over the years. Thus, to accurately understand his faith, we must consider who is testifying and the time period they are representing of Lincoln’s religious views.

 

Some Early Biographies

A recap of a few early biographies of Lincoln will be helpful. These include authors that treat his faith positively as well as those who present him as an infidel. There is no shortage of books on Lincoln – about 15,000 have been written – nor on his religion, with likely over 100 books and an untold number of articles.

During his presidential campaign, an autobiography and a few short biographies were hurriedly published but contain little insight into his faith. In 1865, the year Lincoln died, J. G. Holland wrote the first analysis of the character of Lincoln in his book, The Life of Abraham Lincoln. Holland gives a positive treatment of Lincoln‘s faith. It contains an account of Newton Bateman’s, part of which Ward Hill Lamon took issue with in his biography of 1872. Mr. Bateman, Superintendent of Public Instruction for the State of Illinois for fourteen years and President of Knox College for 17 years, was a friend of Lincoln from 1842 until his death, having an adjoining Law office for 8 months prior to Lincoln going to Washington and serving as one of the pallbearers at his funeral. Part of Bateman’s statement that Lamon considered untrue were these words attributed to Lincoln, in particular the statement on Christ’s divinity:

I know there is a God, and that He hates injustice and slavery. I see the storm coming, and I know that His hand is in it. If He has a place and work for me—and I think He has—I believe I am ready. I am nothing, but truth is everything. I know I am right because I know that liberty is right, for Christ teaches it, and Christ is God.[5]

 Lamon’s biography was based on manuscripts from William Herndon, Lincoln’s law partner for many years. It was the first source presenting Lincoln as infidel and had a bad reception. Lamon records a number of testimonies from men saying Lincoln was an infidel, yet, there were some problems with Lamon’s statements, as will be discussed below. He relates Lincoln’s burnt book story from his earlier years, contending Lincoln wrote an essay “intended to demonstrate,—first, that the Bible was not God’s revelation; and secondly, that Jesus was not the Son of God.”[6] Lamon quotes John Stuart as saying Lincoln was an avowed and open infidel and sometimes bordered on atheism. Yet, as is discussed below, Stuart refuted Lamon’s and Herndon’s presentation of his views.

In 1889 William Herndon wrote a three-volume biography on Lincoln which reiterated some statements of the infidelity of Lincoln while correcting some errors of Lamon. Parts of it received much opposition. It was reissued later with most offensive parts removed. Herndon portrays Lincoln’s faith in his younger years.

Two other important biographies of the late nineteenth century were the ten-volume set written by John Nicolay and John Hay (1890), Lincoln’s former secretaries, and the two-volume set by John T. Morse, Jr. (1893). Many others followed. Likely the most vicious assault on Lincoln’s integrity came in The Real Lincoln written by Charles Minor. This work from 1904 relies heavily on Lamon and accepts his comments without review.

A review of Lincoln’s religious life will help us to understand the contrary views of Lincoln’s Christian beliefs.

 

Development of Lincoln’s Faith

Early Life

(1809-16, Kentucky; 1816-30, Indiana; 1830-37, New Salem, Illinois)

Abraham was born February 12, 1809, in Hardin County, Kentucky. His parents, Thomas and Nancy Lincoln, were Baptists of the frontier variety. They were greatly impacted by God at a camp meeting in 1806. Nancy’s family was very familiar with the religious fervor that was a part of these revival meetings – the Hankses were “great at camp-meetings.”[7]

During a time when the enthusiastic crowd awaited the “celestial fire” to fall at a meeting in June 1806,

a young man, who had been absorbed in prayer, began leaping, dancing, and shouting, while to his left a young woman, as though inspired by the example she had witnessed, sprang forward, her hat falling to the ground, her hair tumbling down in graceful braids, her eyes fixed heavenward, her lips vocal with strange, unearthly song, her rapture overflowing until, grasping the hand of the young man, they both began singing at the top of their voices.[8]

The family tradition identifies the couple as Thomas and Nancy Hanks, who were reportedly married the next week by Rev. Jesse Head.

In his early years, Abraham attended services held in log meeting houses and heard a variety of preachers. He read the Bible much in younger days, along with a few other books. He never drank, chewed, or smoked, nor was he heard to swear.[9]

His mother, Nancy Hanks, and step-mother, Sally Johnston, were both Godly women and taught him the foundations of the Christian faith. Nancy taught Abe and his siblings to read their Bible. Before his mother died, she told him: “I want you to live as I have taught you, and to love your Heavenly Father and keep His commandments.”[10] Lincoln later remarked: “All that I am or hope to be I owe to my angel mother.”[11]

His early life was hard and often the family went with little, but each meal began with a blessing. One day when the meal was only made of potatoes he remarked to his dad after prayer: “Dad, I call these mighty poor blessings.”[12]

The Lincolns moved to Indiana in 1816 and settled on Little Pigeon Creek, not far from the Ohio River. Abe’s mother died when he was nine years old. After his father remarried, his step-mother Sally continued the Godly training he had received early on.  She said of him: “Abe was a good boy…. Abe never gave me a cross word or look, and never refused in fact or appearance to do anything I requested of him. He was a dutiful son to me always . . . the best boy I ever saw, or expect to see.”[13]

Abe loved and honored his parents. It was from them he received most of his early education. As a youth he developed a great thirst for education and read everything he could get his hands on.  He once walked seven miles to borrow an English grammar. Biographer John Wesley Hill wrote that “he read every book he could borrow within a radius of fifty miles.”[14]

Lincoln wrote, “I never went to school more than six months in my life.”[15] Books he greatly enjoyed and thoroughly read in his youth included the Bible, Aesop’s Fables, Bunyan’s Pilgrim’s Progress, Shakespeare’s plays, Robinson Crusoe, and Weem’s Life of Washington. The Bible was his favorite book and he soaked in its teachings, language, and spirit. This shows up in his speeches throughout his public life.

At age 19 he carried a cargo of farm products to New Orleans to sell. While there he witnessed the slave markets, which revolted him greatly. It is reported he said: “If ever I get a chance to hit that thing, I will hit it hard!”[16]

In 1830 Lincoln, along with the rest his family, moved to New Salem, Illinois, where he worked a variety of jobs. He and a partner bought a store, which failed. Lincoln’s integrity was seen through his faithfulness to repay the debt over many years (his partner not only abandoned his part of the debt, but ran off with much money from the store). After this failure in business, he took up the study of law, believing he may be more suited to this vocation.

In 1832 he ran for the state legislature, but lost. In his platform of principles, he said all citizens should have the opportunity for some education so that they might be able “to read the Scriptures and other works, both of a moral and religious nature, for themselves.”[17]

During these years of early manhood, Lincoln was grappling with his own religious beliefs. Some charged him with infidelity, but men who knew him said they heard him deny it. He did have doubts on various subjects, in particular on the endlessness of future punishment. He based his thinking, however inaccurate, upon his reading of Biblical ideas. He believed that the immortality lost by man due to sin was restored in Christ. He believed Christ restored to the whole human race what had been lost through Adam’s sin. Some close acquaintances agreed with the assessment of his teacher Mentor Graham, who said he was “not an infidel, nor even a deist, but essentially a Universalist.”[18]

Abe was known for his honesty and kindliness of heart. His life was clean and wholesome. Throughout his life he did not drink alcohol nor smoke tobacco. He publicly advocated the cause of temperance.

. . . .

To read the rest of the story order a copy of Abraham Lincoln’s Faith from our online bookstore.

Providential Perspective booklets, like Abraham Lincoln’s Faith, are regularly sent to Providence Foundation Members. Join today!

 

Topics covered include:

  • Development of his Christian faith in Springfield (1837-61)
  • Herndon’s and Lamon’s Views of Lincoln’s Faith
  • Attendance at First Presbyterian Church in Springfield
  • Growth of faith as President
  • His reliance on God and belief in Providence
  • Examples of Lincoln’s faith
  • Lincoln on the Bible
  • Lincoln’s Christian character
  • Lincoln and slavery
  • Lincoln’s public display of faith

 

 


End Notes

[1]Complete Works of Abraham Lincoln: Speeches, Letters, and State Papers, edited by John G. Nicolay and John Hay, 1905. Quoted in William J. Johnson, Abraham Lincoln the Christian, 1913, reprinted by Mott Media, 1976, pp. 157-158.

[2] Ward H. Lamon, The Life of Abraham Lincoln from His Birth to His Inauguration as President, Boston: James R. Osgood & Co., 1872, p. 489, in William E. Barton, The Soul of Abraham Lincoln, New York: George H. Doran Co., 1920, p. 20.

[3] Charles L.C. Minor, The Real Lincoln, From the Testimony of His Contemporaries, Everett Waddey Company, 1904, Atkins-Rankin Co., 1928, republished by Sprinkle Publications, 1992, p. 26.

[4] Letter from James Smith to W.H. Herndon, 24th Jan. 1867, in Barton, p. 323.

[5] Barton, p. 20. For an analysis of the Bateman incident see Barton, pp. 114-127.

[6] Barton, p. 146. Barton shows how the story of Lincoln writing these words in a destroyed manuscript (the “burnt book”) is probably not true since Herndon received this information only from Matheny who was not there; and Lamon misrepresented Matheny in other quotes, as is discussed later.

[7] John Wesley Hill, Abraham Lincoln Man of God, New York: G.P. Putnam’s Sons, 1922, p. 10.

[8] Ibid.

[9] Barton, p. 55.

[10] Hill, p. 14.

[11] Hill, p. 13.

[12] Hill, p. 12.

[13] Hill, p. 19.

[14] Hill, p. 33.

[15] Hill, p. 27.

[16] Hill, p. 50.

[17] Hill, p. 41.

[18] Hill, pp. 136-137.

Baptism by Fire: Pearl Harbor, Hand of God, Mitsuo Fuchida

David G. Smith

It has been over 50 years since the end of the Second World War. Truly the war played a major role in bringing the United States to the place of world leadership it occupies today, so it is useful to remember some of the key events of the war and God’s hand in them, from the American perspective. Although a general war had been raging in Europe since 1939, the U.S. showed no inclination to get involved. President Franklin Roosevelt, who was more hawkish than most Americans, was limited to lending the British outdated naval equipment.

But the events which were going to bring the U.S. into war were occurring in Asia, not Europe. The Japanese had invaded Manchuria in 1931 and the rest of China in 1937. They conquered much of the Chinese coastline, but their war machine was using prodigious amounts of material, and a U.S.-led embargo on oil and steel was stymieing their plans for further conquest in China and then the rest of Southeast Asia. In 1941 the Japanese knew that further conquest of China would probably lead to war with the United States. After months of unsuccessful negotiations over the embargo and the China issue, however, the Japanese General Staff were willing to wait no longer. A quick, surprise strike at Pearl Harbor in Hawaii would disable the U.S. Pacific fleet and allow Japan to capture unmolested large parts of China, Malaysia, the Philippines and oil-rich Dutch East Indies (now Indonesia), which could supply their war machine.

The attack was a complete surprise. It was specifically scheduled for Sunday in hopes of catching the island in minimal defensive readiness. Many sailors and soldiers were on leave or sleeping late. When the attack occurred at 7:55 AM, many sailors who were not sleeping in were on the decks for inspection or religious service. The carnage was great. An attacking Japanese plane dropped a torpedo at the battleship Arizona, then strafed the color guard standing at attention while the American flag was being raised to the tune of the ‘’Star Spangled Banner.’’ In a disciplined manner, the color guard and musicians held their positions until the last note faded, then they sprinted for shelter. Seven battleships were lined up on ‘’Battleship Row’’ (the Pennsylvania was nearby in drydock). The Oklahoma capsized, the West Virginia and California were sunk, and the Nevada was damaged and beached near the mouth of Pearl. Tennessee, Maryland and Pennsylvania were all damaged, and ten other ships were sunk or seriously damaged. The Arizona sank with 2000 sailors on board, after a stupendous explosion of its forward magazine. Just eight days earlier, the official Army-Navy football game program had carried a picture of the Arizona with the words, ‘’It is significant that despite the claims of air enthusiasts no battleship has yet been sunk by bombs.’’ But pride goeth before a fall, and that fact would change for the Arizona on December 7th.1

As  terrible as the results were, they could have been far worse. The two vital U.S. carriers stationed at Pearl were (providentially) on maneuvers at sea  when the attack came. The oil storage tanks, which could have created a mammoth conflagration and placed Pearl in a severe oil shortage for the first year of the war, were unscathed. So too were the repair facilities, including the important drydocks. As a result of this, three of the battleships sunk on December 7th were later raised, and the drydocks at Pearl played a vital role in repairing the carrier Yorktown before the vital battle of Midway. The airborne leader of the Pearl Harbor attack, Mitsuo Fuchida, strongly urged making a second attack to disable these vital facilities. Minoru Genda, the strike leader of the carrier, urged the same, and even advised that the strike force should tarry in the area for several days in hopes of catching the returning carriers. But Admiral Chuichi Nagumo, in charge of the attacking fleet, demurred. He faced a dilemma military leaders have often faced (most recently during the Persian Gulf War): What to do when an attack succeeds beyond expectations and at very little loss to the attacking force? Japanese projections of casualties were as high as one-third of the striking force. As things stood now, he had a great victory, but it could be diminished by further losses. Nagumo chose to protect his fleet and aircraft and withdraw.

The attack succeeded in uniting U.S. public opinion against Japan in a way that a conflict over Southeast Asia or the distant Philippines never would have. This was a country in which, just months earlier, Charles Lindbergh’s ‘’America First’’ isolationist organization had millions in membership. Now outraged citizens chopped down a cherry tree on the National Mall in Washington, D.C., and ‘’America First’’ ceased to exist within days of the attack.

Indeed the Pearl Harbor attack, as awful as it was, was almost a favor to the U.S. fleet. The very effectiveness of the Pearl Harbor attack was proof of the lethality of air strikes from carriers. The brunt of the  attack was taken by the almost obsolescent battleship fleet. Their destruction would convince the U.S. planners that to get back in the war, they had to concentrate on their undamaged carrier forces. Planning, strategy, tactics, and construction schedules were all changed to support fast carriers. The day of the battleship was over.

The attack at Pearl Harbor brought the immense strength of the United States into the war on the Allied side. Roosevelt had long desired greater U.S. participation in the war, but had been stymied by American isolationism. Now the Japanese had handed him all the justification he needed. Hitler helped, too. His treaty with the Japanese was purely a defensive one and there was no obligation to support the Japanese in their aggressive attack on the U.S. But, perhaps carried away by the success of the attack, he declared war on the U.S. as well, after the U.S. Congress had declared war on Japan. In the Providence of God, this enabled Roosevelt and Congress to declare war on the Nazis and adopt a ‘’Europe First’’ strategy which enabled Russia, Britain and America to defeat Hitler before he was able to completely carry out his plan to exterminate the Jews from Central Europe.

What might have happened if there had not have been an attack on Pearl Harbor? The U.S. might have still gotten involved in a limited war with the Japanese in the Pacific, but Roosevelt still would have had difficulties convincing the American public to send their soldiers to fight in Europe. December 7, 1941 was also the apex of the German advance towards Russia. Within days they would be reversed. While British and American aid to Russia was greatly appreciated (as was the opening of a Second Front in France later), it was probably not necessary. They were going to win the war anyway, and without Pearl Harbor, the Iron Curtain might have extended south from Belgium instead of the advance of Communism being halted in central Europe.2

Fuchida’s Conversion

Ultimately, both Germany and Japan suffered crushing defeats, in large part through American involvement. But the story does not end there. ‘’To everything there is a season,’’ and after the time for war, there is a time for peace. It was soon after the war that Mitsuo Fuchida, the lead pilot at Pearl Harbor, became a Christian. After the war, he had testified in war crimes trials in Tokyo, and the proceedings disgusted him. He did not understand concepts like mercy towards a defeated foe, so he assumed the Americans were guilty of the same atrocities towards prisoners of war and occupied areas that they were accusing the Japanese military leaders of. He determined to collect evidence of American atrocities towards POWs, and he began to meet boats of returning Japanese POWs to collect atrocity stories. But what he discovered surprised him. When he met a group of 150 returned POWs at a receiving camp near Yokosuka, he spotted a pilot, Kazuo Kanegasaki, whom he had served with and who was believed to have been killed at the Battle of Midway. He told Fuchida that while prison camp was no picnic, they had generally been well treated. But Kanegasaki and the other POWs had been very touched by the volunteer ministry of Peggy Covell, an 18 year old American girl. She had volunteered to help with the POWs, arriving shortly after the war’s end, and did a great deal to make their stay more bearable, becoming a friend to many of those incarcerated. One of the Japanese finally asked her, ‘’Why are you so kind to us?’’

Mitsuo Fuchida and Jake DeShazer

Covell’s shocking reply was, ‘’Because Japanese soldiers killed my parents.’’

Her parents had served as missionaries in the Philippines before the war. When the Japanese captured the Philippines in late 1941 and early 1942, they retreated to the mountains of the north, where they continued their ministry. When Americans recaptured the Philippines, it was the Japanese who retreated to the north, and there they discovered Covell’s parents. They assumed that the small portable radio the missionaries had was actually a secret communications device and executed them as spies. When Covell found this out after the war, she was filled with animosity and hatred towards the Japanese, but then she meditated on her parent’s selfless service toward the Japanese (they had been missionaries in Japan before they went to the Philippines). She became convinced that her parents had forgiven their executioners, and felt she must do the same, so she volunteered to assist Japanese POWs.

This story was almost incomprehensible to Fuchida. Japanese society considered revenge as a beautiful outcome. Forgiving your executioners was unheard of; instead, a Japanese man about to be executed would pray to be reborn seven times, to exact revenge each time. Children were also supposed to devote themselves to avenging their wronged parents.

Despite the fact that many of his countrymen would consider Peggy Covell as weak lacking in devotion to her parents, Fuchida quickly forgot about his mission to confirm American war atrocities. Instead, he interviewed every ex-POW he could find who knew of Peggy Covell, to make sure the story was true. Fuchida was a zealous researcher; he found out from sources in the Philippines that Mr. and Mrs. Covell had been forced to their knees by their captors and had prayed together as they were about to be beheaded. Fuchida was intrigued — what had they prayed just prior to their execution? He wanted to know.

In early October 1948, as Fuchida headed for the morning train, he came across an American passing out tracts. Entitled (in Japanese) I was a Prisoner of Japan, it caught his attention. It had been written by an American sergeant, Jacob DeShazer, who became a Christian while in a Japanese POW camp. Fuchida read it on the spot and on the train, he saw an advertisement for a book with the same title as the tract. When he debarked, he headed for a bookstore and bought it.

The story engrossed Fuchida. DeShazer had been consumed with hatred for the Japanese after Pearl Harbor, and he volunteered for a ‘’dangerous mission.’’ The mission turned out to be the Doolittle raid on Tokyo in 1942, America’s first offensive response to Pearl Harbor. (This attack would providentially goad the Japanese into making their ill-fated attack on Midway Island.) DeShazer, however, was captured after his plane crashed in Japanese-occupied China, and he was sent to a POW camp in China. Truly, though, God does use the ‘’wrath of man to praise Him.’’ DeShazer was consumed with so much hatred he nearly went mad, and he began to wonder why so much hatred existed in the world. He began to read the Bible to find out. He memorized much of the New Testament, became a Christian, and promised God if he survived the war, he would return to Japan as a missionary.

The Doolittle raiders were men who had Fuchida’s respect for their daring and audacious raid on Tokyo. Fuchida determined to buy a Bible to understand this brave man better. In fact, on his return trip, as he was heading towards the bookstore where he bought DeShazer’s book, he came across a Japanese man selling New Testaments. Fuchida bought one, but it was nine months before he would open it.

One of the Doolittle Raiders’ B-25 bombers taking off from the aircraft carrier USS Hornet, April 18, 1942.

In June of 1949 Fuchida saw a newspaper column in which one of Japan’s most famous novelists (who was a Christian) urged his readers to read the Bible. He told them, ‘’Please read only thirty pages anywhere in the Bible, and undoubtedly you will find something that will touch your heart.’’ Normally, Fuchida just glanced at the headlines, but today he was reading through the whole paper and this article convinced him to pick up his Bible. He read two to three chapters each day, thoroughly considering each point before he moved on. And each hour he would review in his mind what he had learned in that day’s reading. Fuchida found the miracles difficult to understand (although in later years he would consider them to be a cornerstone of the faith), but he was attracted to the moral message. In September, he read the story of the crucifixion for the first time in the gospel of Luke. It touched the deepest part of his heart. When he read Jesus’ words, ‘’Father, forgive them, for they know not what they do,’’ (Luke 23:24), he realized this must have been what Peggy Covell’s parents were praying right before their execution.

By the time he finished the Gospel of Luke, Fuchida had become a Christian. He found that the more he read, the more he could accept the New Testament in its entirety. But he had no Christian friends, and openly declaring himself to be a Christian would bring much reproach. Christianity was considered the ‘’occupation religion’’ in Japan, as MacArthur’s fine work in trying to bring missionaries to the conquered nation had the unintended effect of associating the missionaries in peoples’ eyes with the more odious parts of MacArthur’s occupation policy. Some saw it as an attempt to weaken Japanese national identity. What was Fuchida to do?

The next step Fuchida took was to write to the name and address on the back of the little tract about DeShazer he had been handed on the way to the train station. The minister whose address was listed there, Timothy Pietsch, was handling outreaches all over Japan, so did not get back to Fuchida for nearly six months, but in the spring of 1950 he wrote Fuchida, suggesting they meet in Osaka. There Fuchida met with Pietsch and Glenn Wagner, head of the Pocket Testament League in Japan. After some initial misunderstanding and discomfort because they did not realize Fuchida had already become a Christian, Wagner told Fuchida that to grow he must read the Bible, pray, and bear witness to his new life in Christ. This last step Fuchida felt was impossible. But after Wagner told him that after he read the Bible more, he would want to witness, Fuchida realized he was just being cowardly, and told the two men he was ready to bear witness that day.

They took Fuchida to an open air outreach in the business section of Osaka. When the Americans were sharing, fewer than forty Japanese would stop to listen. But when Fuchida, ‘’hero of the Pearl Harbor attack’’ was introduced, the crowd swelled rapidly. Hundreds gathered, rush hour traffic was stopped, and even the police who came for crowd control listened in. Fuchida shared how he had been a man of war, but now he wanted to work for peace. ‘’But how can mankind achieve lasting peace? True peace of heart, mind and soul can only come from Jesus Christ.’’

This was the beginning of Fuchida’s successful new career as an evangelist. He followed it up with an auditorium meeting at Osaka, in which he shared his story and how the example of Peggy Covell had affected him. Close to five hundred Japanese came forward, and the rally was reported on by almost all the major newspapers in Japan. Unhampered by the issues of culture, race, and politics which limited the success of Western missionaries, he saw hundreds come to the Lord in Japan by the end of his productive career.

Another approach that Fuchida took was significant to his success. He thought it was important to work within the existing cultural framework. While he did not compromise his message, and felt Christianity would prevail over Shintoism and Buddhism in the free marketplace of ideas, he also considered it important not to needlessly antagonize his countrymen, and to show them that a Christian could still be a good Japanese citizen. He himself did not consider Christianity to be an abrogation of the Shinto religion, but rather its fulfillment. ‘’It was like having the sun come up’’ was how he described his own conversion. He used Shinto concepts like hakko ichiu (‘’all the world under one roof’’) and shikei doho (‘’all nations are brothers’’) to preach against Japanese egocentrism and xenophobia and to preach peace through Christ. Like Paul at Mars Hill (Acts 17:16-34), and undergoing the rite of purification in Jerusalem (Acts 21:20-26), Fuchida was willing to work within the cultural context he was ministering in.

Still, Fuchida paid a price for his witness. Not only did he turn down a lucrative offer from the Japanese government to reorganize the Self-Defense Air Force, he also once faced down an angry ex-kamikaze pilot who came to his house to accuse him of betraying Japan. The kamikaze pulled a knife, but rather than resist, Fuchida simply told him he could kill him if he wanted to, but that becoming a Christian had not made him less of a lover of his country. Several years later Fuchida saw his would-be attacker in one of the churches where Fuchida was speaking. This man too had become a Christian.

Fuchida also visited Europe and the United States spreading his message of peace and reconciliation through Christ. Space will not permit us to recount all the tales of his evangelistic endeavors, but perhaps this humble story will suffice as an illustration.

During his evangelistic travels, Fuchida did not forget to ‘’remember those in prison, as if you were in prison with them’’ (Hebrews 13:3), and he liked to make prison visits, where possible, during his visits to Japanese towns. In one town, Fuchida discovered that a hardened group of twenty condemned murderers had not been permitted to attend his earlier lecture at the prison. Fuchida resolved to see them also, and he was granted just one hour. There was no time for war stories here. Instead, he shared everything he knew about Jesus’ love for sinners. Recalling the crucifixion account in Luke which had been so pivotal in his own conversion, he told them how Christ had died for them, crucified with a thief on his right and left, and how He had assured the repentant thief that that very day he would be with Him in paradise.

Every man in the room accepted Christ and asked forgiveness for their sins. Then they formed a group they called the ‘’Calvary Club’’ to help them stay true to their new-found faith and hope.

Later the prison director communicated to Fuchida the end of the Calvary Club. ‘’Before,’’ he wrote, ‘’the guards had to drag condemned men to the gallows, but the members of the Calvary Club walked to the gallows like men, upright and straight, praying every step of the way, ‘Christ, be with me today in Paradise!’ ‘’

Fuchida died on May 30, 1976. His biographers write of him, ‘’Undoubtedly, Fuchida would have considered his whole life worthwhile if he had recruited just one soul for Christ. And he counted his converts in the hundreds.’’ He had gone from being a vital part of Japan’s attack on the United States to a vital part of God’s offensive into the hearts and minds of Japanese. To God Alone Be Glory.

*  *  *  *  *

David Smith has a Masters degree in history from the University of Virginia and has written numerous historical articles from a providential perspective.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Endnotes

The account of Mitsuo Fuchida’s life was based exclusively on God’s Samurai: Lead Pilot at Pearl Harbor, by Gordon W. Prange with Donald Goldstein and Katherine V. Dillon (Washington: Brassey’s (US), Inc., 1990).

1  Walter Lord, Day of Infamy, (New York: Henry Holt, 1957), pp. 70-71, 220.

2  I am indebted to the now out-of-print Ballantine Book, Midway: The Turning Point for this idea.

 

 

Another Japanese Hero of the Faith: Chiune Sugihara

David G. Smith

Another Japanese hero of the Second World War was diplomat Chiune Sugihara. Born on January 1, 1900, Sugihara’s father had wanted him to become a doctor, but he wanted to study literature and live overseas. His father threw him out after he deliberately failed the entrance exams to study medicine, and he worked a number of odd jobs before answering a newspaper ad for the Japanese Foreign Ministry. When he discovered the ministry wanted Russian speakers, he went back to college and learned Russian. It was there he also converted to one of the Orthodox branches of Christianity.

In the fall of 1939, he was sent to establish a Japanese consulate in Kaunas, Lithuania. His official role was to serve as a diplomat and also to spy on the German and Russian military forces in the area. He would play a key role in assisting thousands of Jews to escape death at the hands of Hitler’s henchmen. After the conquest of Poland in 1939, the Germans began to persecute Polish Jews and send them to the concentration camps. Many Jews fleeing from the persecution passed through Kaunas. One morning in late July of 1940, Sugihara found more than one hundred Polish Jews waiting outside the Japanese consulate. They were seeking transit visas to travel through Japan to the Dutch West Indies (Indonesia).

Sugihara had already heard rumors of Nazi atrocities toward the Jews. Yet the Germans were a valuable ally the Japanese did not want to offend. Three times Sugihara requested permission to issue the visas, three times he was turned down.

Sugihara was no stranger to taking courageous stands. In 1934 he had resigned a position in Manchuria because of his outrage over Japanese atrocities against captured Chinese. This time, however, he had a wife and children to think of. Nevertheless, he decided to risk his life and career to issue the visas. He told his wife, ‘’I may have to disobey my government, but if I don’t, I will be disobeying my God.’’

Soon the Russian army annexed Lithuania, and Sugihara was ordered to close the consulate and leave by the end of August. Each visa application required several paragraphs of writing, and Sugihara wrote them out longhand so that no other consular official would be required to risk their careers. He wrote the visas everyday, opening the consulate early, skipping lunch and working late. At night, his wife would massage his aching arms. Even after he left the consulate, he left a notice of the hotel where he was staying, and continued to issue visas from there. He continued to write visas until the moment the train carrying him to his next diplomatic assignment left the station. It was estimated later that he saved over 10,000 Jews, although it is not known whether they all reached the safety of the Dutch West Indies or perished elsewhere.

When the war ended, Sugihara finally returned home in 1947, only to be fired by the Foreign Ministry. He believed this was due to his actions in issuing the visas. Then a rumor started that he had profited financially from issuing the visas (in fact, he had even stopped collecting the usual fee early on). Reputation is extremely important in Japanese society, and he lost both his career and lost face in a short period of time. For awhile he had to sell light bulbs door-to-door (many Japanese were reduced to destitution by the end of the war), but his wife said he never complained.

In 1964, Sugihara was finally located by some of the Jews he had aided and he began to receive some belated recognition. In 1985, shortly before his death, he received Israel’s highest award, ‘’Righteous Among Nations,’’ which other Gentiles who rescued Jews during the Holocaust have also received, including Oskar Schindler and the Swedish diplomat Raoul Wallenberg.

(This account of Sugihara’s courage is based exclusively on Matthew Robinson’s article ‘’World War II Rescuer Sugihara: Diplomat Solved Moral Dilemma with an Act of Courage,’’ published in the Investor’s Business Daily on June 20, 1996, page 1.)

George Washington: “An Instrument in the Hands of Providence”

 

Biblical World University

By Stephen McDowell


 

Order Apostle of Liberty: The World changing Leadership of George Washington

George Washington is one of the most significant men in all of history. Regarding the direct advancement of civil and political liberty in the earth, he may well be the most significant champion in all history. Certainly he was the central figure of bringing a new era of liberty to the world in modern times. Abraham Lincoln observed:

Washington is the mightiest name of earth —long since mightiest in the cause of civil liberty, still mightiest in moral reformation. On that name no eulogy is expected. It cannot be. To add brightness to the sun or glory to the name of Washington is alike impossible. Let none attempt it.1

Founding Father Fisher Ames said that Washington changed the standard of human greatness.2 One biographer wrote, “Washington was without an equal, was unquestionably the greatest man that the world has produced in the last one thousand years.”3 Thomas Paine observed: “By common consent, Washington is regarded as not merely the Hero of the American Revolution, but the World’s Apostle of Liberty.”4

A figure in history like Washington did not just arise by happenstance. It was the near unanimous consent of early Americans that Washington, like Esther of old, had “come to the Kingdom for such a time as this.”

After Washington’s death hundreds of commemorative orations were given all over the United States. Nearly all of them declare that Washington was a gift of God to the American people and to all of mankind. Some mention this in passing, many with this as the dominant theme. Washington is called the Moses of the American people, the Joshua who led his people into the promised land, and the savior of his country.

In his sermon “On the Death of George Washington,” Rev. Jedidiah Morse concluded his comparison of Moses and Washington by saying:

Never, perhaps, were coincidences in character and fortune, between any two illustrious men who have lived, so numerous and so striking, as between Moses and Washington. . . Both were born for great and similar achievements; to deliver, under the guidance of Providence, each the tribes of their respective countrymen, from the yoke of oppression, and to establish them, with the best form of government and the wisest code of laws, an independent and respectable nation.5

General Morgan, who fought alongside Washington during the Revolutionary War, acknowledged that Washington was key for obtaining independence, relating that while there were many officers with great talents, he was “necessary, to guide, direct, and animate the whole, and it pleased Almighty God to send that one in the person of George Washington!”6

President Calvin Coolidge summed up Washington’s contribution to mankind, under the Providence of God, in a speech to Congress:2

Washington was the directing spirit without which there would have been no independence, no Union, no Constitution and no Republic. His ways were the ways of truth. His influence grows. In wisdom of action, in purity of character he stands alone. We cannot yet estimate him. We can only indicate our reverence for him and thank the Divine Providence which sent him to serve and inspire his fellow men.7

Washington’s contribution to the birth of America and the advancement of liberty in the world is unsurpassed by any man. Without Washington, America would not have won the Revolution. He provided the leadership necessary to hold the troops together, even in the most difficult situations. As one contemporary observed, Washington was “that hero, who affected, with little bloodshed, the greatest revolution in history.”8 Due to Washington’s influence, America avoided a monarchy or military rule — he rebuffed an attempt to make him King; he thwarted a military coup; and he set an example of civilian rule by resigning as Commander-in-Chief. The Constitutional Convention would not have succeeded without Washington’s influence as President of that body. America may never have set into motion her constitutional form of government, with a limited role of the President, without his example, for the unanimously elected Washington modeled how the President was to govern. Washington also set the standard for American international relations in his Farewell Address.

There would be no America, the land of liberty, without Washington, the apostle of liberty. The unique freedom, justice, and virtue incorporated into the American Republic have in the last two centuries spread throughout the world and taken root in many nations. Hence, Washington’s legacy has impacted the world, and will continue to do so for centuries to come.

His greatness did not stem from oratorical skills or superior knowledge or brilliant military tactics, but rather from his strong virtues, sense of duty, and invincible resolution. When he was offered leadership of the army and leadership of the nation, he expressed doubts in his abilities to accomplish these tasks, but once he occupied those positions, nothing could stop him from performing his duty. By sheer force of character he held the disorganized nation together during the great struggle for independence, and after victory was won, the love of the people for him provided the unifying factor necessary to set a course for the American constitutional republic.

The providence of God and Washington’s Christian faith were key to his character, career, and accomplishments. His faith, heart, and humility are revealed in the “Circular to the Governors of the states” in 1783 when he prayed that God would protect them and “most graciously be pleased to dispose us all to do justice, to love mercy, and to demean ourselves with that charity, humility, and pacific temper of mind, which were the characteristics of the Divine Author of our blessed religion, and without an humble imitation of whose example in these things, we can never hope to be a happy nation.”9

In his famous “Oration on the Death of General Washington,” Gen. Henry Lee said that Washington was “first in war, first in peace, and first in the hearts of his countrymen.” “Vice shuddered in his presence, and virtue always felt his fostering hand; the purity of his private character gave effulgence to his public virtues.” Washington was first because, as Lee said, he was “the man designed by Heaven to lead in the great political, as well as military, events which have distinguished the area of his life. The finger of an overruling Providence pointing at Washington was neither mistaken nor unobserved.”103

Washington himself had a sense of how God used him providentially to advance the cause of liberty to mankind as well as an understanding of the providential purpose of America, writing in March 1785:

At best I have only been an instrument in the hands of Providence, to effect, with the aid of France and many virtuous fellow Citizens of America, a revolution which is interesting to the general liberties of mankind, and to the emancipation of a country which may afford an Asylum, if we are wise enough to pursue the paths wch. lead to virtue and happiness, to the oppressed and needy of the Earth.11

America set in motion a new example of religious, civil, and economic liberty that the nations have attempted to embrace during the last two centuries. The advancement of liberty in the world is directly related to the establishment of liberty in America, which owes its beginnings in large part to George Washington. Paine’s epithet of “World’s Apostle of Liberty” is, therefore, most fitting. Americans and citizens of the world who value liberty must forever keep alive in their hearts this great man and seek to follow his example.

 

This article is taken from Apostle of Liberty: The World-Changing Leadership of George Washington by Stephen McDowell. This book can be ordered from the Providence Foundation,

 

 


End Notes

1. Lucretia Perry Osborn, Washington Speaks for Himself (New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons, 1927), xi.

2. Works of Fisher Ames, as published by Seth Ames (1854), edited and enlarged by W.B. Allen, vol.1 (Indianapolis: Liberty Classics, 1983), 527.

3. William Wilbur, The Making of George Washington (DeLand, Florida: Patriotic Education, 1973).

4. “George Washington: Deist? Freemason? Christian?” by James Renwick Manship, in Providential Perspective, Vol. 15, No. 1, Feb. 2000, Charlottesville: Providence Foundation.

5. Jedidiah Morse, “A Prayer and Sermon, Delivered at Charlestown, December 31, 1799, On the Death of George Washington . . . With an Additional Sketch of His Life” (London: Printed by J. Bateson, 1800), 28.

6. Recollections and Private Memoirs of the Life and Character of Washington by George Washington Parke Custis, Benson J. Lossing, editor, (Philadelphia: Englewood, 1859), 322.

7. Osborn, p. iv. A facsimile of the peroration of President Coolidge’s Address to the Sixty-ninth Congress, Second Session, on Washington’s Birthday, February 22, 1927.

8. Letter of Dr. Letsom of London to a friend in Boston, in E. C. M’Guire, The Religious Opinions and Character of Washington (New York: Harper & Brothers, 1836), 326.

9. Circular to the States, June 8, 1783, The Writings of George Washington from the Original Manuscript Sources, 1745-1799, John C. Fitzpatrick, Editor (Washington: United States Government Printing Office, 1931), 26:496.

10. “Oration on the Death of General Washington, Pronounced before Both Houses of Congress, on December 16, 1799” by Major-General Henry Lee, in Custis, 622, 618-619.

11. Letter to Lucretia Wilhemina Van Winter, March 30, 1785, The Writings of George Washington, 28:120.